Psychology Dictionary of ArgumentsHome
| |||
|
| |||
| Experiment: artificial bringing about of an event or artificial creation of a state for testing a hypothesis. Experiments can lead to the reformulation of the initial hypotheses and the reformulation of theories. See also theories, measuring, science, hypotheses, Bayesianism, confirmation, events, paradigm change, reference systems._____________Annotation: The above characterizations of concepts are neither definitions nor exhausting presentations of problems related to them. Instead, they are intended to give a short introduction to the contributions below. – Lexicon of Arguments. | |||
| Author | Concept | Summary/Quotes | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|
|
W. Poundstone on Experiments - Dictionary of Arguments
I 202f Experiment/Poundstone: an experiment is invalid if it was run sloppy. - The results can be true or false. Error: E.g. expectation experiment (assuming that the experimenter unconsciously determined the result): a) if the results are true, you cannot trust the test persons b) if the results are wrong, there is no prejudice effect c) if the study is valid, then the result is true, and the investigation is invalid. Poundstone: the investigation is not valid in any case. >Statistics, >Error, >Expectations, >Method, >Validity, >Correctness._____________Explanation of symbols: Roman numerals indicate the source, arabic numerals indicate the page number. The corresponding books are indicated on the right hand side. ((s)…): Comment by the sender of the contribution. Translations: Dictionary of Arguments The note [Concept/Author], [Author1]Vs[Author2] or [Author]Vs[term] resp. "problem:"/"solution:", "old:"/"new:" and "thesis:" is an addition from the Dictionary of Arguments. If a German edition is specified, the page numbers refer to this edition. |
Poundstone I William Poundstone Labyrinths of Reason, NY, 1988 German Edition: Im Labyrinth des Denkens Hamburg 1995 |
||
> Counter arguments against Poundstone
> Counter arguments in relation to Experiments
